All the words and images pouring in from Haiti remind us how social media have revolutionized the standards for communicating in times of crisis. In spite of the gut wrenching imagery, it’s a positive thing that anyone with a camera, phone, or computer can publish their thoughts and feelings globally.
Crowd-sourced news and freelance / celebrity writers have reduced the need for traditional investigative journalism. We no longer rely on “the professionals” to challenge existing orthodoxies; rather, we leave the critical thinking to the people we know and trust and respect.
As other have said, disasters of the scale that struck Haiti this week usually see a huge outpouring of cash and interest in the immediate aftermath, which almost disappears within the first year. And who will do the follow up reporting? Professional journalists, or the crowd?
I’ve been thinking more and more about the internet and democracy, specifically bloggers’ rights vs journalists’ rights with regards to free speech. As it becomes easier for writers to get set up with their own personal publishing platforms, the distinction between “blogger” and “journalist” becomes grayer and much less relevant.
Work is generally acknowledged as journalism if meets three criteria:
And yet, high quality writing that meets the 3rd criteria is being produced daily by thousands of individuals who do not enjoy the same protections and rights that traditional journalists enjoy. These such writers are known collectively by the pejorative term “bloggers” and judged as second class simply because they self-publish.
©2010. Tumblr theme by Greg Cooper. Icons by P.J. Onori. With thanks to Jamie Cassidy. Inspired by Panic.
Comments